I must apologise for the lack of posts recently. But to be quite honest there hasn't been all that much to speak about. With most resident birds molting at this time of year they aren't as showy as usual, and at the best of times they still can't always be called showy. I have however done my best to at least have a couple of images to post.
Well I'm still in Ireland, and around the land bird life is thin. So, like many wildlife photographers do at this time of year I have spent a...small while photographing butterflies. Well perhaps not a small while as such. They are about the only thing I'm photographing so small doesn't do the amount of time justice. Although I wouldn't say I've got any good images yet.
The problem I've had most is backgrounds and perches. But on a rare occasion I have had a bit of luck with where they choose to land.
I've mostly been focusing on Small Copper and Silver-washed Fritillary Butterflies, as I won't get another opportunity with these for a while as the city isn't usually ideal habitat for them!
Anyway I won't post loads of butterfly pictures....yet.
Surprisingly I have managed a few bird photos. But I think putting emphasis on the few would be a good idea. Unless you count the day I took several hundred images of Fulmar. But I will save the details of that for another day.
I did also spend a while getting covered in mud stalking Black-tailed Godwits and got within 15 foot of a Stonechat. But I think that too can wait until I am back in England.
I will however tell that I have managed a few year ticks. Taking me to 159 for the year, so close to 160. Tantalisingly close. But hopefully the 160 tick wont be far off. My life-list though still stands stead-fast on 170, at least that is a nice round number. But to reach my end-of-the-year goal I still need another five ticks. I really need to get the last few fairly common ones I haven't yet got, so hopefully it should be possible.
I will also forewarn you to expect...hmmm......about three more Ireland blogs, or maybe four? -sorry.
Thursday, 29 August 2013
Friday, 2 August 2013
Wildlife Watching Supplies Camera/lens Cover Review.
For a wildlife photographer being able to shoot in the elements is vital to get eye-catching shots. You must however protect your equipment. This is why I always keep a camera/lens cover in my bag when I'm out photographing. I personally use a camera/lens cover from Wildlife Watching Supplies, made in Britain with fine quality Proofed Polycotton in camouflage colour on the outside and uniform olive-green water-proof nylon on the other. The end is elasticated so that it fits snugly on the lens hood covering the whole of the lens, at the front there is a drawstring to cover the camera's LCD screen.
I've used this camera/lens cover for a couple of months now and have been constantly impressed by it. Shorty after I got it I was in Ireland for a week So when the inescapable rain came, instead of staying indoors I went out to test it. I spent around an hour wandering around the countryside getting completely soaked. When I got back inside however the lens beneath the cover was bone-dry. The same couldn't be said for me. I noticed that rather than being absorbed, the rain slides off the cover, but a constant soaking can get into the polycotton. This is no trouble though as it dries surprisingly quickly and doesn't get through the waterproof nylon beneath.
Not only does the cover protect your camera/lens from the elements it also camouflages it and breaks up the outline helping disguise the camera.
The only downside to this product is that it reduces control over the zoom. If you use a prime lens however this will be no problem, I for one use a zoom lens for the versatility it gives.
The camera/lens cover by Wildlife Watching Supplies is a must have for all photographers, it folds up small so won't take up much space in your bag, but most importantly it keeps your equipment safe from the elements.
I've used this camera/lens cover for a couple of months now and have been constantly impressed by it. Shorty after I got it I was in Ireland for a week So when the inescapable rain came, instead of staying indoors I went out to test it. I spent around an hour wandering around the countryside getting completely soaked. When I got back inside however the lens beneath the cover was bone-dry. The same couldn't be said for me. I noticed that rather than being absorbed, the rain slides off the cover, but a constant soaking can get into the polycotton. This is no trouble though as it dries surprisingly quickly and doesn't get through the waterproof nylon beneath.
Not only does the cover protect your camera/lens from the elements it also camouflages it and breaks up the outline helping disguise the camera.
The only downside to this product is that it reduces control over the zoom. If you use a prime lens however this will be no problem, I for one use a zoom lens for the versatility it gives.
The camera/lens cover by Wildlife Watching Supplies is a must have for all photographers, it folds up small so won't take up much space in your bag, but most importantly it keeps your equipment safe from the elements.
Thursday, 1 August 2013
Wait a Min -smere
I have spent the last week camping, hence the lack of posts of late. I will not however bore you with the obvious discomfort of sleeping for a week on an air bed, but instead I will bore you with a ton of photographs.
Well the campsite was in Suffolk, so....how could we resist visiting Minsmere? We couldn't. And we picked the perfect day for going, and this time I am not being sarcastic about it. Really I'm not.
Maybe this picture will help you to believe me.
Curlew Sandpiper is that? Yep. Well from the East hide I got 5 life-ticks, I know, I hardly dared believe it. The one the other birders got most excited about though was a Wood Sandpiper, showing well but far away, very far away. Typical rare bird behavior, well if it's a rare bird that I see typical behavior. But regardless of this I enjoyed it extremely, again no sarcasm there.
We missed a Bittern from that hide -typical- so moved on to the aptly named Bittern hide where 30 minutes provided us with brief flight views of a Bittern -not so typical- then another flight view 20 minutes later. After another hour or so my father asked whether I wanted to go to one of the other hides. I said we should wait a little longer -hence the title- and that paid off as soon, the Bittern came out of the reeds only 20-30 meters away! Ah, the satisfaction of finally seeing a Bittern when time after time I had failed.
As though to treat me for my perseverance -if you can call it that- this Bittern didn't just show for a few minutes and then disappear, it showed for well over 80 minutes and was still there when we left -unbelievable.
I mean could you hope for better views? Well I suppose that if I could have been eye level.....
I must confess to being slightly trigger happy, I took well...ah...about 500 images of the one bird...ahem. Worth it though.
Well the campsite was in Suffolk, so....how could we resist visiting Minsmere? We couldn't. And we picked the perfect day for going, and this time I am not being sarcastic about it. Really I'm not.
Maybe this picture will help you to believe me.
Curlew Sandpiper is that? Yep. Well from the East hide I got 5 life-ticks, I know, I hardly dared believe it. The one the other birders got most excited about though was a Wood Sandpiper, showing well but far away, very far away. Typical rare bird behavior, well if it's a rare bird that I see typical behavior. But regardless of this I enjoyed it extremely, again no sarcasm there.
We missed a Bittern from that hide -typical- so moved on to the aptly named Bittern hide where 30 minutes provided us with brief flight views of a Bittern -not so typical- then another flight view 20 minutes later. After another hour or so my father asked whether I wanted to go to one of the other hides. I said we should wait a little longer -hence the title- and that paid off as soon, the Bittern came out of the reeds only 20-30 meters away! Ah, the satisfaction of finally seeing a Bittern when time after time I had failed.
As though to treat me for my perseverance -if you can call it that- this Bittern didn't just show for a few minutes and then disappear, it showed for well over 80 minutes and was still there when we left -unbelievable.
I mean could you hope for better views? Well I suppose that if I could have been eye level.....
I must confess to being slightly trigger happy, I took well...ah...about 500 images of the one bird...ahem. Worth it though.
Saturday, 20 July 2013
What Do You Put on Your Garden list?
When I was younger I would only ever put birds that had actually landed in my garden on my garden list. But of course this throws up difficulties. Birds like Swift are not going to land in your garden are they? So do you tick them? If they were on your patch you would so why not your garden.
Yesterday I got an amazing garden tick. An adult Mediterranean Gull in fine breeding plumage. Obviously I couldn't let this off the garden list, but it flew over, so do I put it on the list? If so the Kestrels, Peregrines, Sparrowhawks, Cormorants that have all flown over make it on to the list too. I'm not complaining though, it adds about another ten to the list if you count all the fly overs. But does that also mean you can tick birds that were actually in someone else's garden? Surely yes. But then is it not a bit dishonest, putting Common Gull on your garden list when it was really in a neighbours? Maybe you should change it to a 'Seen from garden' list, but who wants two different lists for their garden? No one, so you then have no option but to put the birds on, do you?
My garden list is somewhere around forty very low I know, but it is a rather very small garden, about 7 by 5 meters in size. And not a very wild area either, just your average suburban street.
Sunday, 14 July 2013
Isle Be Back
Yesterday was the hottest day so far this year. I for one hope it will be the hottest day this year. It was unbearable. With this in mind we left early for Elmley Marshes on the Isle of Sheppey. By the time we arrived at 9:30 it was already over 20 degrees. And at one point on the way back it reached 36 degrees in the car. Horrible.
Apparently the path to the reserve is the best part. So I set up my beanbag - no, not to sit on myself (see here) - and got the camera ready. Oh, talking of cameras my 7D turned up, incredible piece of kit! Well, back to the subject: we soon found a Marsh Harrier gliding on distant thermals. A couple of Yellow Wagtails, which I must admit at the time we, well...thought they were pipits. I know I know, but the colours weren't easy to see properly through the front windscreen.
Lapwings and Redshanks were just sitting on the side of the track, although the Redshanks weren't posers, the same can't really be said about the lapwings.
A Hare was also seen along the track but no good shots as it was running away. Nice to see though. Such an incredible species.
The walk to the first hide was fairly long but I picked up Reed Warbler and Sedge Warbler along the way. It was so good to get the Reed Warbler after hearing so many but not seeing any. Phew.
Well, the hide...amazing! Previously my views of Avocets have been appalling, here though, not the same. Just bad angles.
This juvenile came close to the hide, just wish I could have got an eye level shot, oh well. There were at least 30 Avocets here. Great, considering not too long ago there were no breeding birds in this country.
By this time the sun was too hot, I had already drunk a whole bottle of water, glad we brought three. So walking 500m to the next hide in this heat to see nothing, made me 'over the moon'.
I found two Med Gulls on the reserve, an adult and a 1st year bird. That takes my 'found' Med Gull list to 5. an odd list to keep.
But still, forgetting that I had a great day out, nice to put the 7D to the test. I took over 700 shots, so, I think I put it through its paces.
It was amazing at this time of year, so what would it be like in winter? Well I will definitely be back here at some time of year or other.
Apparently the path to the reserve is the best part. So I set up my beanbag - no, not to sit on myself (see here) - and got the camera ready. Oh, talking of cameras my 7D turned up, incredible piece of kit! Well, back to the subject: we soon found a Marsh Harrier gliding on distant thermals. A couple of Yellow Wagtails, which I must admit at the time we, well...thought they were pipits. I know I know, but the colours weren't easy to see properly through the front windscreen.
Lapwings and Redshanks were just sitting on the side of the track, although the Redshanks weren't posers, the same can't really be said about the lapwings.
A Hare was also seen along the track but no good shots as it was running away. Nice to see though. Such an incredible species.
The walk to the first hide was fairly long but I picked up Reed Warbler and Sedge Warbler along the way. It was so good to get the Reed Warbler after hearing so many but not seeing any. Phew.
Well, the hide...amazing! Previously my views of Avocets have been appalling, here though, not the same. Just bad angles.
This juvenile came close to the hide, just wish I could have got an eye level shot, oh well. There were at least 30 Avocets here. Great, considering not too long ago there were no breeding birds in this country.
By this time the sun was too hot, I had already drunk a whole bottle of water, glad we brought three. So walking 500m to the next hide in this heat to see nothing, made me 'over the moon'.
I found two Med Gulls on the reserve, an adult and a 1st year bird. That takes my 'found' Med Gull list to 5. an odd list to keep.
But still, forgetting that I had a great day out, nice to put the 7D to the test. I took over 700 shots, so, I think I put it through its paces.
It was amazing at this time of year, so what would it be like in winter? Well I will definitely be back here at some time of year or other.
Saturday, 6 July 2013
London Birding
Yesterday we did some birding in London, no we didn't go to Kensington Gardens -at first anyway- we went instead to Regents Park. I mean unheard of? Me going somewhere in London other than Kensington Gardens? Wow. I had hoped to get good views of Kestrels, I did, but not close views as I had hoped. Actually they were quite far off, too far for any decent shots. But nice to see as they were juvenile Kestrels.
A search for Little Owls here proved fruitless so.....Yes we went to Kensington Gardens.
Getting there was a rather uncomfortable experience: The temperature was unbearable on the tube trains, and to make it worse they were packed with tourists. It was standing room only. Our water was getting warm and running out too.
It was worth it. I always enjoy hand-feeding the birds there, such a simple pleasure. I spent most of the time trying flight shots and did nail one but the background ruined it. A shame, the focus was dead on.
I have a little bit of news too. This week I -finally- bought myself my own camera! I don't think my bank is happy with me, but forget about that it will be amazing! I should have it by next week, so expect a lot -an awful lot of pictures.
Monday, 1 July 2013
'Owl' Many Rabbits?
You'll never-ever-ever guess where I went on Wednesday. No wait.....Maybe you will. So does it surprise you if I say I went to Minsmere? I would hope so because I didn't go there. Where I did go however is somewhere whose wealth of wildlife is somewhat more surprising than Minsmere's. Kensington Gardens.
We arrived at the park in the afternoon and soon after we bumped into Ralph Hancock and had a chat about what had been seen today. As we were talking a fellow wildlife photographer came up to ask about the Owls. So Ralph led us to the tree and soon had the Little Owl on a new perch higher up the tree than last time. Again the lighting was far from preferable. Getting the Owl exposed right meant the background was over-exposed....Oh well. Still nice to get a good view of an owl.
I had a chat with the photographer we met while we went looking for Tawny Owls and some other wildlife. He was here on a business trip and had taken the day off to come here. He was happy with what he saw. We had no luck with the Tawny Owls unfortunately, but you can't have everything.
We moved on around the lake, I managed to pick up a Reed Warbler on call, but couldn't see it. I still need one for my year-list. I have had an unconfirmed, but 90% certain sighting but I can't be definitive.
Around the lake we saw a Red-crested Pochard, it came too close a lot of the time, and the lighting wasn't preferable.
We then decided to take a quick look for Rabbits as we haven't seen them here before and we had to leave soon. Well we saw some Rabbits....A lot of Rabbits. We counted 16 in one small cleared area. And they were extremely tame.
I have noticed something -well to me- interesting; all the star species of this visit are introduced! The Romans brought the Rabbits over for food when they invaded, most of the Little Owls came from Holland, and it wouldn't surprise me if Charles the 2nd introduced Red-crested Pochard. Funny how species like the Rabbit fit in so well with our ecosystem: they provide excellent food for Buzzards and foxes. Little Owls....Well I don't know if they benefit our ecosystem but they seem to fit in well, and are very apt at surviving here. Fossil evidence in Derbyshire shows they did once live here but were wiped out in this country. Who knows how?
A trip up to a local golf-course here in Brighton payed dividends with Whitethroat, Green Woodpecker, Pheasant, Rook and Linnet all being seen. Linnet takes me to 143 for the year. No Skylark unfortunately, but they are most likely still there.
We arrived at the park in the afternoon and soon after we bumped into Ralph Hancock and had a chat about what had been seen today. As we were talking a fellow wildlife photographer came up to ask about the Owls. So Ralph led us to the tree and soon had the Little Owl on a new perch higher up the tree than last time. Again the lighting was far from preferable. Getting the Owl exposed right meant the background was over-exposed....Oh well. Still nice to get a good view of an owl.
I had a chat with the photographer we met while we went looking for Tawny Owls and some other wildlife. He was here on a business trip and had taken the day off to come here. He was happy with what he saw. We had no luck with the Tawny Owls unfortunately, but you can't have everything.
We moved on around the lake, I managed to pick up a Reed Warbler on call, but couldn't see it. I still need one for my year-list. I have had an unconfirmed, but 90% certain sighting but I can't be definitive.
Around the lake we saw a Red-crested Pochard, it came too close a lot of the time, and the lighting wasn't preferable.
We then decided to take a quick look for Rabbits as we haven't seen them here before and we had to leave soon. Well we saw some Rabbits....A lot of Rabbits. We counted 16 in one small cleared area. And they were extremely tame.
I have noticed something -well to me- interesting; all the star species of this visit are introduced! The Romans brought the Rabbits over for food when they invaded, most of the Little Owls came from Holland, and it wouldn't surprise me if Charles the 2nd introduced Red-crested Pochard. Funny how species like the Rabbit fit in so well with our ecosystem: they provide excellent food for Buzzards and foxes. Little Owls....Well I don't know if they benefit our ecosystem but they seem to fit in well, and are very apt at surviving here. Fossil evidence in Derbyshire shows they did once live here but were wiped out in this country. Who knows how?
A trip up to a local golf-course here in Brighton payed dividends with Whitethroat, Green Woodpecker, Pheasant, Rook and Linnet all being seen. Linnet takes me to 143 for the year. No Skylark unfortunately, but they are most likely still there.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)